Using Caché ObjectScript
This chapter covers the following topics:
A transaction is a logical unit of work. Transaction processing helps maintain the logical integrity of your database.
For example, when transferring money from one account to another, a bank may need to subtract an amount from a field in one table and add the same amount to a field in another table. By specifying that both updates form a single transaction, you ensure that either both operations are performed or neither is performed, which means that one cannot be executed without the other.
Within your application, a single SQL INSERT
, or DELETE
statement, or a single global SET
, may not in itself constitute a complete transaction. In such cases, you use transaction processing commands to define the sequence of operations that forms a complete transaction. One command marks the beginning of the transaction; after a sequence of possibly many commands, another command marks the end of the transaction.
Under normal circumstances, the transaction executes in its entirety. If a program error or system malfunction leads to an incomplete transaction, then the part of the transaction that was completed is rolled back.
Application developers should handle transaction rollback within their applications. Caché also handles transaction rollback automatically in the event of a system failure and at various junctures, such as recovery and during HALT
Managing Transactions Within Applications
In Caché, you define transactions within applications using either
SQL statements in macro source routines
Caché ObjectScript commands
Both techniques work, regardless of whether the database modifications that constitute the transactions are performed with SQL INSERT
, and DELETE
statements or Caché ObjectScript SET
These SQL and Caché ObjectScript commands are summarized in the following table.
Caché Transaction Commands
||Set transaction parameters without starting a transaction.
||Marks the beginning of a transaction.
||Detects whether a transaction is currently in progress:
||Mark a point within a transaction. Can be used for partial rollback to a savepoint.
||Signals a successful end of transaction.
||Signals an unsuccessful end of transaction; all the database updates performed since the beginning of transaction should be rolled back or undone.
These ObjectScript and SQL commands are fully compatible and interchangeable, with the following exception:
and SQL START TRANSACTION
both start a transaction if no transaction is current. However, START TRANSACTION
does not support nested transactions. Therefore, if you need (or may need) nested transactions, it is preferable to start the transaction with TSTART
. If you need compatibility with the SQL standard, use START TRANSACTION
The Caché MultiValue Basic
(MVBasic) transaction commands are also compatible with ObjectScript and SQL transaction commands.
Using LOCK in Transactions
Whenever you access a global which might be accessed by more than one process, you need to protect the integrity of the database by using the LOCK
command on that global. You issue a lock corresponding to the global variable, change the value of the global, then unlock the lock. The LOCK
command is used to both lock and unlock a specified lock. Other processes wishing to change the value of the global request a lock which waits until the first process releases the lock.
There are three important considerations when using locks in transactions:
Lock/unlock operations do not roll back.
Within a transaction, when you unlock a lock held by the process, one of two things may occur:
The lock is immediately unlocked. The lock can be immediately acquired by another process.
The lock is placed in a delock state. The lock is unlocked, but cannot be acquired by another process until the end of the current transaction.
If the lock is in a delock state, Caché defers the unlock until the transaction is committed or rolled back. Within the transaction, the lock appears to be unlocked, permitting a subsequent lock of the same value. Outside of the transaction, however, the lock remains locked. For further details, refer to the Lock Management
chapter of this book.
Lock operations that time out set $TEST
. A value set in $TEST
during a transaction does not roll back.
Using $INCREMENT and $SEQUENCE in Transactions
A call to the $INCREMENT
function is not considered part of a transaction. It is not rolled back as part of transaction rollback. These functions can be used to get an index value without using the LOCK
command. This is advantageous for transactions where you may not want to lock the counter global for the duration of the transaction.
allocates individual integer values in the order that increment requests are received from one or more processes. $SEQUENCE
provides a fast way for multiple processes to obtain unique (non-duplicate) integers for the same global variable by allocating a sequence (range) of integer values to each incrementing process.
may be incremented by one process within a transaction and, while that transaction is still processing, be incremented by another process in a parallel transaction. If the first transaction rolls back, there may be a skipped
Transaction Rollback within an Application
If you encounter an error during a transaction, you can roll it back in three ways:
When you roll back a transaction, the IDKey for any default class is not decremented. Rather, the value of the IDKey is automatically modified by the $INCREMENT
Issue an SQL or Caché ObjectScript Rollback Command
Application developers can use two types of rollback commands to designate the unsuccessful end of a transaction and automatically roll back incomplete transactions:
The rollback command must cooperate with an error trap, as in the following example:
ROU ##sql(START TRANSACTION) set $ZT="ERROR"
##sql(COMMIT WORK) Write !,"Transaction Committed" Quit
ERROR ##sql(ROLLBACK WORK)
Write !,"Transaction failed." Quit
In the example code, $ZT
is set to run the subroutine ERROR if a program error occurs before the transaction is committed. Line ROU
begins the transaction and sets the error trap. Lines ROU+1 and ROU+3 set the nodes of the global ^ZGLO
. However, if the variable error is undefined, ROU+2
causes a program error and line ROU+3
does not execute. Program execution goes to the subroutine ERROR
and the set of ^ZGLO(1)
is undone. If line ROU+2
were deleted, ^ZGLO
would have its value set both times, the transaction would be committed, and the message Transaction committed
would be written.
If you have not handled transaction rollback with a rollback command, the error trap utility %ETN
detects incomplete transactions and prompts the user to either commit or rollback the transaction. You should handle rollback within your application, since committing an incomplete transaction usually leads to degradation of logical database integrity.
If you run %ETN
after an error when a transaction is in progress, the following rollback prompt is displayed:
You have an open transaction.
Do you want to perform a Commit or Rollback?
If there is no response within a 10-second timeout period, the system defaults to rollback. In a jobbed job or an application mode job, the transaction is rolled back with no message.
itself does not do anything to trigger transaction rollback, but it typically ends by halting out of Caché. Transaction rollback occurs when you halt out of Caché ObjectScript and the system runs %HALT
to perform Caché process cleanup. There is an entry point into %ETN
, called BACK^%ETN
, which ends with a quit, rather than a halt. If a routine calls BACK^%ETN
, rather than ^%ETN
, it will not perform transaction rollback as part of the error handling process.
Examples of Transaction Processing Within Applications
The following example shows how transactions are handled in macro source routines. It performs database modifications with SQL code. The SQL statements transfer funds from one account to another:
Transfer(from,to,amount) // Transfer funds from one account to another
SET A.Account.Balance = A.Account.Balance - :amount
WHERE A.Account.AccountNum = :from)
If SQLCODE TRollBack Quit "Cannot withdraw, SQLCODE = "_SQLCODE
SET A.Account.Balance = A.Account.Balance + :amount
WHERE A.Account.AccountNum = :to)
If SQLCODE TROLLBACK QUIT "Cannot deposit, SQLCODE = "_SQLCODE
QUIT "Transfer succeeded"
Automatic Transaction Rollback
Transaction rollback occurs automatically during:
Caché startup, if recovery is needed. When you start Caché and it determines that recovery is needed, any transaction on the computer that was incomplete will be rolled back.
Process termination using the HALT
command (for the current process) or the ^RESJOB
utility (for other processes). Halting a background job (non-interactive process) automatically rolls back the changes made in the current transaction-in-progress. Halting an interactive process prompts you whether to commit or roll back the changes made in the current transaction-in-progress. If you issue a ^RESJOB
on a programmer mode user process, the system displays a message to the user, asking whether they want the current transaction committed or rolled back.
In addition, system managers can roll back incomplete transactions in cluster-specific databases by running the ^JOURNAL
utility. When you select the Restore Globals From Journal
option from the ^JOURNAL
utility main menu, the journal file is restored and all incomplete transactions are rolled back.
System-Wide Issues with Transaction Processing
Backups and Journaling with Transaction Processing
Consider the following backup and journaling procedures when you implement transaction processing.
Each instance of Caché keeps a journal. The journal is a set of files that keeps a time-sequenced log of changes that have been made to the database since the last backup. Caché transaction processing works with journaling to maintain the logical integrity of data.
The journal contains SET
operations for globals in transactions regardless of the journal setting of the databases in which the affected globals reside, as well as all SET
operations for globals in databases whose Global Journal State
you set to Yes.
Backups can be performed during transaction processing; however, the resulting backup file may contain partial transactions. In the event of a disaster that requires restoring from a backup, first restore the backup file, and then apply journal files to the restored copy of the database. Applying journal files restores all journaled updates from the time of the backup, up to the time of the disaster. Applying journals is necessary to restore the transactional integrity of your database by completing partial transactions and rolling back uncommitted transactions, since the databases may have contained partial transactions at the time of the backup. For detailed information, see:
Asynchronous Error Notifications
If multiple asynchronous errors are detected for a particular job, the system triggers at least one such error. However, there is no guarantee which error will be triggered.
The asynchronous errors currently implemented include:
Some locks once owned by this job have been reset.
Some data modifications performed by this job have received an error from the server.
A distributed transaction initiated by this job has been asynchronously rolled back by the server.
Even if you disable a job receiving asynchronous errors, the next time the job performs a ZSync
command, the asynchronous error is triggered.
At each TStart
, or LOCK
operation, and at each network global reference, Caché checks for pending asynchronous errors. Since SET
operations across the network are asynchronous, an arbitrary number of other instructions may interpose between when the SET
is generated and when the asynchronous error is reported.